Why did the US pick Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

The Allies feared that any conventional attempt to invade the Japanese home islands would result in enormous casualties, and the bomb was seen as a way of bringing the war against Japan to a swift conclusion. In addition, it may also have been a way of demonstrating American military superiority over the Soviet Union.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on bbc.co.uk


Why did the US specifically choose Hiroshima and Nagasaki to bomb?

Hiroshima was chosen as the primary target since it had remained largely untouched by bombing raids, and the bomb's effects could be clearly measured.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on atomicarchive.com


Why did America choose Nagasaki?

Ultimately U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson persuaded Truman to take Kyoto out of consideration as it was Japan's cultural center and a cherished city. Nagasaki, another important port, was chosen as its replacement. Targeting was finalized on July 25, 1945: Hiroshima, Kokura, Nilgata, Nagasaki.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on globalzero.org


Why did the US choose to nuke Hiroshima?

Therefore, the then US president, Harry Truman, authorised the use of atomic bombs in order to make Japan surrender, which it did. Why was Hiroshima chosen for the attack? Truman decided that only bombing a city would not make an adequate impression. The aim was to destroy Japan's ability to fight wars.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on business-standard.com


Did the US warn Japan about atomic bomb?

The president of the USA, Harry Truman, warned the Japanese to surrender. When they did not, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing around 40,000 people and wounding 60,000. Japan quickly surrendered.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on nationalarchives.gov.uk


Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings: Were Nuclear Weapons Required to End the War?



Was Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?

The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyextra.com


Why was the atomic bomb unnecessary?

Several leading air commanders, including Generals Hap Arnold and Curtis LeMay, said that the atomic bombs were unnecessary because conventional bombing had already brought Japan to its knees. Remarks of this sort can be understood in the context of internal military politics and budgetary positioning.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on nationalww2museum.org


Who made the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan?

In recent years historians and policy analysts have questioned President Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan. For President Truman, the decision was a clear-cut one. In 1945, America was weary of war.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on trumanlibrary.gov


What is the best explanation for why the United States decided to target Hiroshima 5 points?

What is the best explanation for why the United States decided to target Hiroshima? It was a center of communications, military command, and supply point for the Japanese army. It would have few casualties because it was nearly destroyed by previous bombings.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on quizlet.com


How were Nagasaki and Hiroshima chosen?

Thousands of people were made homeless and fled the devastated city. Hiroshima was chosen because it had not been targeted during the US Air Force's conventional bombing raids on Japan, and was therefore regarded as being a suitable place to test the effects of an atomic bomb.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on bbc.co.uk


Why did the US use nukes on Japan?

Overview. The United States detonated two atomic bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, killing 210,000 people—children, women, and men. President Truman authorized the use of the atom bombs in an effort to bring about Japan's surrender in the Second World War.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on khanacademy.org


Would Japan have surrendered without the atomic bombings?

However, the overwhelming historical evidence from American and Japanese archives indicates that Japan would have surrendered that August, even if atomic bombs had not been used — and documents prove that President Truman and his closest advisors knew it.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on latimes.com


Is Hiroshima still radioactive?

Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on city.hiroshima.lg.jp


Why was the atomic bomb dropped on Japan and not Germany?

The Manhattan Project was led by the United States along with the Great Britain and Canada under the scientific direction of Dr. Robert Oppenheimer and came about due to rising fears that Nazi Germany was developing nuclear weapons. This decision drop the bomb was made by President Harry Truman.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on trumanlittlewhitehouse.org


Why did President Truman feel that the atomic bomb had to be used against enemy targets?

Why did President Truman feel that the atomic bomb had to be used against enemy targets? "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender...
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on nmsd.wednet.edu


How did the Japanese feel after the atomic bomb was dropped on them?

Further, 28 percent of the people of Japan as a whole said they had never reached a point where they felt they could not go on with the war, whereas 39 percent of the people in the Hiroshima-Nagasaki areas said they had never reached such a point.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on atomicarchive.com


Why shouldn't the US have dropped the atomic bomb?

The United States would have looked weak and foolish. A failed demonstration might even serve to increase Japanese resolve. Additionally, the U.S. only had two bombs left after Los Alamos. If the demonstration failed to convince the Japanese to surrender, only one bomb would remain.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyonthenet.com


Was the atomic bomb a war crime?

“In 1945, though, dropping the atomic bomb was not seen as a “war crime" but rather as a necessary means to an end – the end of a horrific war." Who is going to the home of those Gold Star families and say, “We had a powerful weapon that could have ended the war, but we didn't use it.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on daytondailynews.com


Was the bombing of Hiroshima ethical?

Just weeks after Japan's surrender, an article published in the conservative magazine Human Events contended that America's atomic destruction of Hiroshima might be morally "more shameful" and "more degrading" than Japan's "indefensible and infamous act of aggression" at Pearl Harbor.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on origins.osu.edu


What do Japanese think of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

As for the atomic bombings themselves, first and foremost Japanese society holds Hiroshima and Nagasaki up as the epitome of the suffering and destruction that war brings.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on history.stackexchange.com


Why did the United States drop the second bomb so soon after the first?

The explicit reason was to swiftly end the war with Japan. But it was also intended to send a message to the Soviets. The explicit reason was to swiftly end the war with Japan.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on history.com


Did people's eyes fall out in Hiroshima?

Charred remains of the deceased with eyes protruding

With the fierce pressure of the blast the air pressure in the area dropped instantaneously, resulting in eyeballs and internal organs popping out from bodies.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on pcf.city.hiroshima.jp


What is worse than an atomic bomb?

Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear bombs, are more powerful than atomic or "fission" bombs. The difference between thermonuclear bombs and fission bombs begins at the atomic level.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on youtube.com


How long until Hiroshima was habitable?

It was being said, he reported, that Hiroshima might remain uninhabitable for 75 years. Yet within 24 hours, survivors were already returning to the city to search for relatives, friends, and former homes in the rubble.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on nationalgeographic.com


What would happen if the US didn't drop the atomic bomb on Japan?

Without the bombs, the war would have likely dragged on for at least another year, perhaps longer. The Allies' plan for Japan was called Operation Downfall and consisted of two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyofyesterday.com