Why could the rich merchant not be executed?

Answer: (c)'the merchant was too thin to be properly executed on the stake.

Why was the rich merchant not executed?

The merchant would not be put to death because he was too thin to be executed with a stake. They thought of punishing another person instead of the merchant – one who was fat enough to be executed with a stake.

Why was rich merchant was executed?

He was being punished only because his wall had fallen on the thief. Secondly, he said that his father had been to blame. But because his father had died, the king ordered the merchant to be executed in place of his father.

How did Merchant escape being executed?

According to the king, the real culprit was the merchant's dead father. As he was dead, he could not be punished and in place of him, his son who had inherited all his property would be punished. The merchant escapes the punishment as the minister feels that he is too thin to be killed by the stake.

Who saved the merchant from execution?

Answer: The king had ordered the execution of the rich merchant. Since the rich merchant could not be executed the decision was executed to fit the stake. The disciple's Guru had a vision and save everything in order to save his disciple, The Guru hatched a plan.

Why YOU Wouldn't want to be the 10th Roman soldier!

Who did the rich merchant blame for the weak wall?

Answer: The merchant blamed the bricklayer who had not built the wall right thus causing the thief's death. This bricklayer had built the wall in the times of the rich merchant's father. 24.

Why was the rich merchant summoned by the king?

When he was coming out carrying the loot, the wall collapsed on his head killing him on the spot. His brother rushed to the king and complained that the merchant should be punished for not building a strong wall. The king summoned the merchant.

How did the king justify the execution of the merchant?

The king wanted to punish the merchant because the wall of his house and it fell on the thief killing him. Since the merchant had inherited his father's wealth he inherited his sins too therefore, he should be punished.

Was the merchant really to be blamed?

(iv)Was the merchant really to be blamed? The wall that led to the thief's death had collapsed because it had become weak after the thief had made a hole in it to sneak into the house of the merchant. Hence, the merchant was not to be blamed for the thief's death.

How did the merchant defend himself?

Answer. Answer: The merchant defended himself by telling that the weak wall was not his fault, but was the fault of the bricklayer who had constructed it.

Who did the king decide to execute in place of the merchant?

Answer: A man who become fat because of eating.

Who was executed in the end class 9?

Answer: That night, the king and his minister went secretly to the prison, released the guru and the disciple, disguised themselves as the two, and as arranged beforehand with loyal servants, were taken to the stake and promptly executed.

Who did the dancing girl put the blame on?

Answer. Answer: The dancing girl blames the goldsmith, who had to make some jewellery for her, but had not made it in time. Because of this, she had to visit him several times, thereby walking up and down the street in front of the brick-layer, disturbing him.

Why was the merchant not executed by the king?

Answer: The merchant would not be put to death because he was too thin to be executed with a stake. They thought of punishing another person instead of the merchant - one who was fat enough to be executed with a stake.

What was foolish about the king's trial of the merchant?

Question 7 : What was foolish about the king's trial of the merchant? Answer : A thief, who had broken the wall of the merchant's house was killed due to wall of the merchant's house collapsing on his head. So, the king ordered that the merchant should be punished for the thief's death. This was a foolish judgement.

What is the moral of the story the Kingdom of fools?

The story is a folktale and gives two messages. The first message is that one should stay away from foolish people; else one is bound to suffer. The second message is that in order to tackle foolish people one should employ wisdom and not logic. The guru does not argue or reason the innocence of his disciple.

What arguments did the king present to punish the merchant?

Answer: The king wanted to punish the merchant because the wall of his house and it fell on the thief killing him. Since the merchant had inherited his father's wealth he inherited his sins too therefore, he should be punished.

What was the dancing girl blamed for?

Answer: The dancing girl blames the goldsmith, who had to make some jewellery for her, but had not made it in time. Because of this, she had to visit him several times, thereby walking up and down the street in front of the brick-layer, disturbing him.

What did the goldsmith say about the rich merchant in particular and rich man in general?

Answer. Answer: The goldsmith said that he could not give the dancer her jewellery soon because he had to finish a rich merchant's order.

Why was the king's army unable to help in the execution of the criminal?

The king's authorities could not get the criminal executed as per the king's orders because there was neither a guillotine for cutting heads off nor an executioner in their kingdom. Then, they tried hiring a guillotine and an executioner from their neighbouring countries.

Who was summoned next to the rich merchant?

Answer: The bricklayer was summoned after the rich merchant.

Why was Merchant summoned to the court?

Following people were tried in the king's court: 1) The merchant was the first accused because the wall of his house collapsed and killed the thief. 2) The second accused was a bricklayer who built the weak wall that collapsed and killed the thief.

What did the guru and his disciple find at the grocery shop?

What astonished the guru and disciple at the grocer's shop? Answer: They were astonished that everything at the shop whether a measure of rice or a bunch of bananas cost the same, i.e., a duddu.

Why was the bricklayer found not guilty?

The brick layer was not found guilty as he was distracted by the anklets of the dancing girl. EXPLANATION: In the story named 'In the Kingdom of fools', the narrator has explained how foolish people are hard to understand and are dangerous.

What punishment was given to the person who disobeyed the order?

If any person disobeys any rule or order which a ¹[Government] has made in pursuance of this Act and for the punishment of disobedience to which express provision has not been made elsewhere in this Act, he shall be punishable for every such offence with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.