What is the difference between sprint review and retrospective?

The key difference is that a Sprint Review focuses on improving so the team can deliver a better product, whereas a Sprint Retrospective focuses on improving the overall system so the team can work more harmoniously and find flow together.

What is the difference between a retrospective and a review?

In a nutshell, a Review is about the outcome, while the Retrospective focuses on the process.

What is a sprint review for?

The sprint review is one of the most important ceremonies in Scrum where the team gathers to review completed work and determine whether additional changes are needed. The official Scrum Guide describes it as a working session and makes the point that the “Scrum team should avoid limiting it to a presentation.”

What is the difference between Scrum review and retrospective?

In a nutshell, the sprint review is about the product, while the sprint retrospective is about the team. While the sprint review helps you to regularly meet customer expectations, retrospectives allows scrum teams to become faster, smarter, and even happier. And that's just scratching the surface.

What is a sprint retrospective?

The sprint retrospective is a recurring meeting held at the end of a sprint used to discuss what went well during the previous sprint cycle and what can be improved for the next sprint. The Agile sprint retrospective is an essential part of the Scrum framework for developing, delivering, and managing complex projects.

Sprint Review vs Retrospective - What is the difference?

What are the 3 retrospective questions?

What is the purpose of a retrospective?

Definition: A retrospective is a meeting held after a product ships to discuss what happened during the product development and release process, with the goal of improving things in the future based on those learnings and conversations.

When should we have sprint review?

The Sprint Review is the second to last event of the Sprint and is timeboxed to a maximum of four hours for a one-month Sprint. For shorter Sprints, the event is usually shorter.

How long is a sprint review?

Sprint reviews are limited to a maximum of four hours. The general rule of thumb is to allow one hour for sprint review every one week of sprint length. That means teams should timebox sprint review to two hours for a two-week sprint and four hours for a one-month sprint.

Does sprint review happen before or after release?

The sprint review occurs on the last day of the sprint. The purpose of the meeting is for the team to show the customers and stakeholders the work they have accomplished over the sprint so that the entire Scrum team can receive feedback to fine-tune the product backlog and release plan.

Who runs a sprint review?

The sprint review is usually attended by the Scrum Master, the Scrum team, the product owner, and the internal and external stakeholders. The product owner runs and manages the review process, while the Scrum Master ensures that the event takes place and everyone understands its purpose.

Who is responsible for sprint review?

The sprint review is an informal meeting which the development team, the scrum master, the product owner and the stakeholders will attend. The team gives a demo on the product and will determine what are finished and what aren't.

What are the three main events of a sprint review meeting?

A Sprint Review includes the following events:Attendees include the Scrum Team and key stakeholders if invited by the Product Owner;The Product Owner discusses the 'done' and 'what has not been done' items of the Product Backlog,The Development team explains what went well during a Sprint, what obstacles they faced, ...

What is the difference between sprint backlog and product backlog?

The Product Backlog contains all the items in the software development project. The Sprint Backlog contains only the items of the Backlog specific to the current Sprint. Sprint Backlogs are the songs. The complete Product Backlog is the album.

What are the 5 Scrum ceremonies?

What does Scrum Master do during sprint review?

Sprint Review is a Scrum event that takes place at the end of a Sprint. The Scrum Master role supports this event, ensures that the meeting takes place at the right time and that all participants understand its purpose.

What are the 4 Scrum ceremonies?

Who is responsible for ROI in Scrum?

The Product Owner is responsible for maximizing return on investment (ROI) by identifying product features, translating these into a prioritized list (Product Backlog) deciding which should be at the top of the list for the next Sprint, and continually re-prioritizing and refining the list (Refining the Backlog).

What are retrospectives in agile?

A retrospective is anytime your team reflects on the past to improve the future. Between technical and non-technical teams, you can retro on just about anything!

What should a sprint retrospective say?

Does Scrum Master participate in retrospective?

However, as a Scrum Master you are also part of the Scrum Team and it is the Scrum Team who participates in the Retrospective. Within the Scrum Guide it says that the Scrum Master serves the other roles by “Facilitating Scrum events as requested or needed”.

What are the 3 pillars of scrum?

That would be scrum - the agile framework that provides a clear process for complex projects in a changeable world. The core of scrum is simple - the three pillars: transparency, inspection and adaptation. In this article, we explore how they impact product development, and how we put them into practice.

Is kanban is better than scrum?

Kanban helps visualize your work, limit work-in-progress (WIP) and quickly move work from "Doing" to "Done." Kanban is great for teams that have lots of incoming requests that vary in priority and size. Whereas scrum processes require high control over what is in scope, kanban let's you go with the flow.

What questions do sprint retrospectives ask?

What topics should be discussed in sprint review?

An effective Sprint review meeting agenda should cover new features, sprint impediments, and an assessment of whether the sprint goal was achieved. Sprint reviews typically last two to four hours and feature a product demonstration where a working version of the latest increment is presented and inspected.