Why the United States should not have dropped the atomic bomb?

The United States would have looked weak and foolish. A failed demonstration might even serve to increase Japanese resolve. Additionally, the U.S. only had two bombs left after Los Alamos. If the demonstration failed to convince the Japanese to surrender, only one bomb would remain.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyonthenet.com


Should the US have dropped the atomic bomb yes or no?

“No.

The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyextra.com


What would happen if the US did not drop the atomic bomb?

The bombs brought a quick end to the war. Without the bombs, the war would have likely dragged on for at least another year, perhaps longer. The Allies' plan for Japan was called Operation Downfall and consisted of two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyofyesterday.com


Why shouldn't the US have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan?

Japan could no longer defend itself from the relentless US air onslaught; ferocious firebombing had reduced most Japanese cities, including Tokyo, to ash. General Curtis LeMay, commander of strategic bombing, even complained that there was nothing left to bomb but “garbage can targets.”
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on asiatimes.com


What were the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bomb?

The Pros and Cons of Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki
  • PROS. ...
  • Pro #1: The bombs ended WWII. ...
  • Con #4: The US could have used a better plan. ...
  • Pro #3: The bombs saved money. ...
  • Con #3: The bombs were deployed too early. ...
  • Pro #4: The bombs made the US a superpower. ...
  • Con #2: The bombs caused a nuclear fallout. ...
  • Pro #5: The bombs saved people.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on prezi.com


Controversy over the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan still lingers



What were the benefits of dropping the atomic bomb?

The most common advantage usually cited for dropping the atomic bombs is that the action would spare more lives than it cost. There had been recent battles at Okinawa and Iwo Jima that had already cost the American military forces thousands of lives.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on futureofworking.com


Is the world safer without nuclear weapons?

The planet would be safer with far fewer nuclear weapons but more dangerous with none. Some hydrogen bombs are small enough to hide in a coat closet -- verification of their destruction, in the absence of a yet-to-be-determined mechanism, and in the absence of a strong international consensus, is impossible.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on smh.com.au


How many lives did the atomic bomb save?

Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on airuniversity.af.edu


How did the atomic bomb affect the world?

After six years of war the first atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. More than 100,000 people were killed, and others subsequently died of radiation-induced cancers. The bombing brought the Second World War to an end.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on teara.govt.nz


Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb essay?

The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America's desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on cram.com


Why was the atomic bomb immoral?

For the Japanese, the bombing caused mass death and immense suffering. For the Americans, it betrayed ideals of noncombatant immunity that many American soldiers and airmen had given their lives to sustain.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on onlinelibrary.wiley.com


Should President Truman have used the atomic bomb?

Harry Truman in 1945 "regarded the [atomic] bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubt it should be used." In a 1958 handwritten document on the rise of the atomic age, he later stated, "Now we are faced with total destruction.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on trumanlibrary.gov


Why was the atomic bomb so important?

The United States bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9, 1945, were the first instances of atomic bombs used against humans, killing tens of thousands of people, obliterating the cities, and contributing to the end of World War II.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on archives.gov


Did America help Japan after the atomic bomb?

After the second atomic bomb was dropped, Japan surrendered and left a large mess to clean up throughout the Pacific theater. To help aid in the process, the United States set up a form of government in Hiroshima to help rebuild the city and give jobs to the people who were struggling to find work.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on library.tamucc.edu


Is Hiroshima still radioactive?

Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on city.hiroshima.lg.jp


Who nuked Japan?

The United States detonated two atomic bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 August 1945, respectively. The two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people, most of whom were civilians, and remain the only use of nuclear weapons in armed conflict.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on en.wikipedia.org


What if Japan didn't surrender?

If Japan Didn't Surrender, America Would Have Leveled It With Battleships. While the attacks definitely made an impression, they did not offer the Navy a long-term strategic role for its battlefleet. Key Point: The U.S. Navy dealt with its surplus of battleships by launching raids along the coast of Japan.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on nationalinterest.org


Who actually invented the atomic bomb?

J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904-1967) was an American theoretical physicist. During the Manhattan Project, Oppenheimer was director of the Los Alamos Laboratory and responsible for the research and design of an atomic bomb. He is often known as the “father of the atomic bomb."
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on atomicheritage.org


Should nuclear bombs be banned?

Why do we need to ban nuclear weapons? Nuclear weapons should be banned because they have unacceptable humanitarian consequences and pose a threat to humanity. The simple reality is that the international community could never hope to deal with the impact of nuclear weapons use.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on icrc.org


How many nukes would it take to destroy the world?

This is why another study had been conducted in 2018 testing a similar scenario that also concluded that it would take 100 nuclear bombs to end this world. What is scarier is that within this world there are 13,080 ready-to-use nuclear warheads and yet it takes such a small amount.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on historyofyesterday.com


Which country has the most powerful weapons in the world 2021?

United States (5,550) China (350) France (290) United Kingdom (225)
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on worldpopulationreview.com


How did the atomic bomb affect the US?

After the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, the mood in America was a complex blend of pride, relief, and fear. Americans were jubilant that the war was over, and proud that the technology created to win the war had been developed in their country.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on scarc.library.oregonstate.edu


Was the atomic bomb a war crime?

“In 1945, though, dropping the atomic bomb was not seen as a “war crime" but rather as a necessary means to an end – the end of a horrific war." Who is going to the home of those Gold Star families and say, “We had a powerful weapon that could have ended the war, but we didn't use it.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on daytondailynews.com


Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945?

Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments, that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on atomicheritage.org


Which of the following is a common argument against the US decision to drop the atomic bomb?

which of the following is a common argument against the U.S. decision to drop the Atomic bomb ? The Japanese were more willing to surrender than the U.S. military thought.
Takedown request   |   View complete answer on quizlet.com